Legal Opinion

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 24, 2008No. Civil 06-1497 (MJD/RLE)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for New Trial, or in the Alternative, for Remittitur. [Docket No. 109] Defendant Jammie Thomas asserts that the amount of the statutory damages award is excessive and in violation of the due process clause of the United States Constitution. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Judgment. [Docket No. 116] The Court has sua sponte raised the issue of whether it erred in instructing the jury that making sound recordings available for distribution on a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Arista Records LLC v. Usenet. Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Rundquist v. VAPIANO SEDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Warner Bros. Records, Inc. v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API