Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. McFry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 3, 1930No. 7 Div. 931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiff seeks recovery of a small strip of land in Piedmont, Ala., claimed as a part of its right of way. This is the second appeal, and the statement of the case as found in the opinion on former appeal obviates any necessity for a repetition here. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. McFry, 217 Ala. 411, 116 So. 113, 114.

Upon remandment of the cause the complaint was amended by eliminating the store building therefrom, otherwise no change appears in the pleading. Upon this trial, as upon the former, defendant pleaded the general issue, thus admitting possession of the property sued for. Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spragins v. FitcheardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Boyett v. Standard Chemical & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Jeffreys v. JeffreysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Collins v. Vaughn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Ritter v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Page v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Ray v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API