Legal Opinion
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Kiltz
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 24, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beekman, S.:
The will propounded for probate is dated August 4, 1920. The testator died on or about February 5, 1924. He left a widow, Mary Kiltz, and one daughter, Hattie Keyser, and three grandsons (children of a deceased daughter), as his only heirs at law and next of kin. By the terms of his will he bequeathed all of his property to Sidney Keyser, who is nominated as sole executor, and his wife, Mary Kiltz, is not referred to therein.
The petition states that the testator left no real estate.
An answer and objections in writing, duly verified, were filed by Mary Kiltz, the widow, alleging…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Barnes v. KlugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Cain v. CainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Greenfield v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re OrrellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In re the Probate of the Will of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of De CosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of SchwimmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
- In re the Estate of HeneseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.