Scafetta v. Arlington County
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
UPON REHEARING
Opinion
A petition for rehearing was granted in this appeal because Scafetta asserted that evidence in the record supported his contention that the radar device used to measure the speed of his automobile was not one accepted for use by the Federal Communications Commission. In fact, Scafetta proffered the trial court “that the model KR-10SP is not the same as an earlier model manufactured by Kustom Electronics, the model KR-10.”
This proffer tends to establish only that the radar device used to check the speed of Scafetta’s automobile is not the model KR-10 included on the public…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Toro v. City of NorfolkCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Tony Williams v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Scott M. White, s/k/a Scott Matthew White v. CWCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.