Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anderson v. Neal

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 30, 1981Published

1Concurrence

WERNICK, GODFREY, ROBERTS and CARTER, JJ.,

concurring.

Dissenting opinion by DUFRESNE, A. R. J., in which McKUSICK, C. J., and NICHOLS, J., join.

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice, dissenting, joined by McKUSICK, C. J., and NICHOLS, J.

With due respect to the views of the majority, I firmly believe that the adoption by this Court at this time of the “discovery rule” in legal malpractice cases is tantamount to judicial legislation, and, therefore, I must dissent.

When does the statute of limitations begin to run for an injury suffered as a result of legal malpractice? I conclude that in the instant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API