Anderson v. Neal
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Concurrence
WERNICK, GODFREY, ROBERTS and CARTER, JJ.,
concurring.
Dissenting opinion by DUFRESNE, A. R. J., in which McKUSICK, C. J., and NICHOLS, J., join.
DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice, dissenting, joined by McKUSICK, C. J., and NICHOLS, J.
With due respect to the views of the majority, I firmly believe that the adoption by this Court at this time of the “discovery rule” in legal malpractice cases is tantamount to judicial legislation, and, therefore, I must dissent.
When does the statute of limitations begin to run for an injury suffered as a result of legal malpractice? I conclude that in the instant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.