Parks v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The extraordinary motion for new trial in the case at bar is not challenged as to form or as to any requirements of the Code. It is contested solely on the merits. One question only is presented for decision by the writ of error, namely, did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to grant the accused a new trial on his extraordinary motion based solely upon the ground of newly discovered evidence? In determining this question there are certain well-established and controlling principles of law which we must apply to the facts in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Van Scoik v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Lord v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.