Legal Opinion
United States v. Alan J. Citrin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1992No. 91-15594PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Alan Citrin appeals from a summary judgment in which the district court found the United States entitled to statutorily prescribed damages resulting from Citrin’s breach of a scholarship agreement with the United States. Citrin contends that he was excused from performing under the contract and that the damages were improperly calculated. We affirm.
The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1345. We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Martin, 872 F.2d 319, 320 (9th…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Steven M. Martin Peggy D. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- United States v. Barbara VanhornCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Sergio Ramirez v. Transunion LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Centerline Equipment Corp. v. Banner Personnel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Sharon R. Pfennig v. Household Credit Services, Inc., and Mbna America Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.