Legal Opinion · Dissent

Milchman v. Jayson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 4, 1943Published

1Dissent

I cannot agree with the opinion of the court.

The respondent Helen sought partition of real estate situate in this state of which her father, a widower, died seized, intestate, leaving seven other children. One of the defendants, by counter-claim, sought to charge her share by reason of certain transactions to be hereafter related.

The contention is that the respondent Helen procured apparent title to certain properties in her name by forged instruments purporting to be made by her mother, but in fact made by her after her mother's death. Further, that she obtained large sums of money and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hattersley v. BissettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Speer v. SpeerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  3. Schlicher v. KeelerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API