Legal Opinion

State v. Bingham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1987No. 860292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute for value. U.C.A., 1953, § 58-37-8(l)(a)(ii) (1986 RepLVol.) (as amended). A substantial amount of marijuana was found in defendant’s car after defendant was stopped for driving at a high speed while intoxicated. We affirm the conviction.

The sole issue before us is whether there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s possession to support the jury’s verdict. On appeal, we view the evidence below and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DorseyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HeapsUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SalasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. State v. Cardona-GuetonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. J.W. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. In Re JWCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API