Legal Opinion

Central States Life Insurance v. Hale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1933No. 4-2830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The appellant in this case admits liability for the face value of a certain policy of insurance, the obligations of which it assumed, but it denied liability under the double indemnity clause. From a judgment against this contention in the circuit court, the appellant has prosecuted this appeal.

The pertinent facts are undisputed and are these: The premiums were payable quarterly, and the last premium before the date of the injury was ’ due on October 19, 1931, with thirty-one days of grace in which to pay the same. The insured was fatally injured in the afternoon of the 19th day of November,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Burkheiser v. Mutual Accid. Ass'n of NorthwestCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  3. Railway Mail Ass'n v. DentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Contois v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  2. McDonald v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API