Central States Life Insurance v. Hale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
The appellant in this case admits liability for the face value of a certain policy of insurance, the obligations of which it assumed, but it denied liability under the double indemnity clause. From a judgment against this contention in the circuit court, the appellant has prosecuted this appeal.
The pertinent facts are undisputed and are these: The premiums were payable quarterly, and the last premium before the date of the injury was ’ due on October 19, 1931, with thirty-one days of grace in which to pay the same. The insured was fatally injured in the afternoon of the 19th day of November,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Burkheiser v. Mutual Accid. Ass'n of NorthwestCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Railway Mail Ass'n v. DentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Contois v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- McDonald v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985