Contois v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff is the designated beneficiary in a life insurance policy issued by defendant, upon which this suit was instituted. The complaint contained two counts, one predicated upon the face or principal amount of the policy. Judgment was entered upon this count and has been satisfied. The other count, designated as Count 2, sought recovery in the amount of $4,000, upon an agreement attached to the main policy which insured against injuries sustained through accidental means and resulting in death under certain specified conditions. The court below, on defendant’s motion,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kerns v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Blown v. United States Casualty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
- Sidebothom v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Spaunhorst v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Clarke v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Kuhlmeier v. Hazelwood School Dist.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Hawes v. Kansas Farm BureauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Texas Taco Cabana, L.P. v. Taco Cabana of New Mexico, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2003
- Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978