Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Magras

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 14, 1997No. 96-7660Unknown

1Dissent

WEIS,

dissenting

The Territorial Court and the Appellate Division of the District Court of the Virgin Islands read the licensing provisions as a whole and construed them to be generally directed to business entities, partnerships, and corporations, rather than to individual employees. I agree and would affirm.

The statute says in very broad terms that "[e]very person or association wishing to engage in any business, occupation, profession, or trade listed in § 302" must obtain a license. VI. Code Ann. tit. 27, § 301(a) (1997). In turn, § 302 lists several hundred occupations, services,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollar v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Magras v. SmithDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  3. Smith v. MagrasSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API