Exotex Corp. v. Rinehart
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
MACY, Justice,
specially concurring.
I agree that the default judgment entered against Exotex Corp. should be set aside. I do not, however, agree with the rationale the majority utilized to justify its decision and, consequently, specially concur.
W.R.C.P. 55(b)(1) provides that the clerk may enter a default judgment when the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or for a sum which can, by computation, be made certain. The majority concludes that the clerk did not have authority to enter a default judgment in this case because Rine-hart's claim was not for a sum certain. I disagree with that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- U.S. Aviation, Inc. v. Wyoming Avionics, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Leet v. JoderWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- E & E Mining, Inc. v. Flying "D" Group, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Hill v. HamiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.