Legal Opinion
Bright v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided June 10, 1994No. A-4670PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
John Bright appeals his conviction for first-degree assault, AS 11.41.200(a)(1). He contends that the grand jury heard insuffi cient evidence to support his indictment, that he was not brought to trial within the time limits of Alaska Criminal Rule 45, and that he was denied his right to a public trial because his trial was held in a prison (the Spring Creek Correctional Center in Seward). We uphold Bright’s indictment, and we conclude that he was brought to trial within the time limits of Rule 45, but we conclude that the superior court’s decision to hold Bright’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lilly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Goodman Associates, LLC v. WP Mountain Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- State v. JaimeWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CavanOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.