Legal Opinion

Fligelman v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1995No. 1-94-2801PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

Kenneth Fligelman, a Chicago police officer, sued the City of Chicago (City) for negligently causing injuries he suffered when part of a City bridge fell on him. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. In an earlier appeal this court found that it lacked jurisdiction because the trial court granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. (Fligelman v. City of Chicago (1994), 264 Ill. App. 3d 1035, 637 N.E.2d 1195.) The trial court subsequently entered an order again granting the City summary judgment, but without giving plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. We now…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Colvin v. Hobart Bros.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Material Service Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. McNamee v. Federated Equipment & Supply Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Litchfield Healthcare Center v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. INST. OF TECH. RES. v. Industrial Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API