Glueckert v. Glueckert
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH
¶ 1 George and Laura Glueekert (Glueckerts) appeal from the District Court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, filed October 7,2014. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as whether the District Court properly applied § 40-9-102, MCA, in denying the Glueckerts’ petition for extended contact with their grandson.
BACKGROUND
¶3 The Glueckerts’ son Thayer was married to the respondent Kristin Glueekert. Thayer and Kristin had a son, M.T., who is the Glueckerts’ grandson. At the time the petition was filed in November 2013, Thayer was serving on active duty in the military and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
- Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Polasek v. OmuraMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Montana State Fund v. SimmsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schwarz v. Schwarz (In Re L.R.S.)Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Glueckert v. GlueckertMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Grandchild visitation of A.L.U.Montana Supreme Court · 2025
- Matter of T.B. L.B. H.B. K.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2017