Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Lecht

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided September 11, 1944No. 258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, District Judge.

This matter was heard on the motions of the defendant Hyman Lecht (1) for a bill of particulars and (2) for dismissal of the action against him.

The Price Administrator brings this action against Joshua Lecht of the City of Providence, doing business as Concord Dressed Beef and Veal Co., and operating a slaughtering and wholesale beef and veal business in the City of Pawtucket, and against his attorney in fact, Hyman Lecht, who at all times pertinent hereto, has managed said business. The Price Administrator prays for an injunction against said defendants under Sec.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
  2. Walling v. Alabama Pipe Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1942
  3. Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  2. Bowles v. Cardinal Cutlery Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API