Daniel v. Motorcars Infiniti, Unpublished Decision (6-16-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Motorcars Infiniti, Inc. (Motorcars) appeals from the trial court's decision denying Motorcars' motion to vacate default judgment or, in the alternative, for relief of judgment. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.
I
{¶ 2} On May 30, 1998, plaintiffs-appellees Horace and Terry Daniel (appellees) purchased a used 1993 Nissan Maxima from Motorcars, a now dissolved corporation whose former place of business was 18122 Rockside Road, Bedford, Ohio. The sales contract, as well as the odometer disclosure, that both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Akron-Canton Regional Airport Authority v. SwinehartOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Doddridge v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence v. Primetime Agrimarketing Network, Inc., Ct2007-0051 (5-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Matter of Wright v. Wright, 08ap-353 (11-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008