Legal Opinion

McClain v. Atwater

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 21, 2013No. SC11-1452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises from the denial of a motion for reimbursement of investigative fees in a capital postconviction proceeding, where the investigative fees exceeded the statutory cap for investigative expenses by an additional $1,844.1 The Florida Department of Financial Services (DFS) denied payment based solely on the fact that the expenses exceeded the statutory cap for investigative expenses. DFS takes the position that it is without authority to pay the amount in excess of the statutory cap unless authorized by court order. Neither DFS nor the State objects to the payment of the expenses,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Makemson v. Martin CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. White v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PINELLAS CTY.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SilvermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Stephen Booker v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Albert A.A. Cartenuto, III v. Justice Administrative CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Albert A.A. Cartenuto, III v. Justice Administrative CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API