Legal Opinion

Vacation of Union St., Pottsville Bor.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1891No. 266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL BY EXCEPTANTS FROM. THE COURT OE QUARTER SESSIONS OE SCHUYLKILL COUNTY. No. 266 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY EXCEPTANTS FROM. THE COURT OE QUARTER SESSIONS OE SCHUYLKILL COUNTY. No. 266 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given. On March 4, 1889, a petition was presented by citizens of Pottsville borough setting forth that by reason of the construction of a certain railroad and of a public street and a bridge, all of Union street in said borough, from the eastern side of Railroad street to Coal street, had been practically abandoned, and, as petitioners believed, had become useless, inconvenient and burdensome, etc.; praying that said portion of Union street be…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The order in this case is affirmed, upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Order affirmed.

On April 13, 1891, a motion for a re-argument was refused.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Bernard v. MauriceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1904
  4. Herrick v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API