Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Maurice

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1904No. 3419Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “D.”

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant for $684.16, balance alleged to be due him as a result of his geStim as the defendant’s agent.

Subsequently the petition was amended and a writ of attach-*220mcnt prayed for and obtained, which writ, however, was dissolved on rule. Thereupon the defendant answered admitting the agency, but denying any indebtedness on her part as resulting from the mandate, and claiming, on -the contrary, that a settlement and liquidation of the agent's account with her would show a balance in her favor. Assuming the character of plaintiff in re-convention, she prays for judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haseltine v. Concord RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  2. Vacation of Union St., Pottsville Bor.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API