Murphy v. Kirkland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Balkin, J.
The primary issue before us is whether, in this administrative proceeding brought under the Human Rights Law (Executive Law art 15), the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the Division) abused its discretion in amending the administrative complaint (hereinafter the complaint) by adding another respondent after the one-year limitations period set forth in Executive Law § 297 (5) had expired, and after the respondent had already appeared pro se on behalf of his company, the sole respondent in the original complaint, at a public hearing on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Mize v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sally v. Keyspan Energy Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Stevens v. Winthrop South Nassau University Health System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v. Boro Park Senior Living Community, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Castagna v. AlmaghrabiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Steve's Pier One, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.