Legal Opinion

Marquez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1981No. 16641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*53OPINION

BASKIN, Justice.

This is a suit for damages for breach of contract. Appellants (plaintiffs) appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of appellee (Sears).

In April, 1975, plaintiffs entered into a written contract with Sears whereby Sears agreed “to provide the necessary treatment to protect the premises ... against the attack of subterranean termites for the sum of $169.00.” Sears also agreed the reinspection would be made at least once during the contract year and that any further treatment then found necessary would be performed free of charge. Sears agreed that for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Schrader v. Artco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. TM Productions, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Crawford Chevrolet, Inc. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Andrews v. Houston Lighting & PowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MarquezTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Marquez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API