Legal Opinion · Dissent

Greenberg v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2006Published

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1DissentRead, J.

Section 20 of the Workers’ Compensation Law specifies that “[e]xcept as provided in section twenty-seven of this article, all awards of the board shall draw simple interest from thirty days after the making thereof’ (Workers’ Compensation Law § 20 [1]). Thus has the Legislature plainly negated the predecision interest for which the majority principally finds warrant in the Human Rights Law and our decision in Matter of Aurecchione v New York State Div. of Human Rights (98 NY2d 21 [2002]). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Mittl v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Rubies v. Aqua Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Aurecchione v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API