Legal Opinion · Dissent

Darnall v. Day

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1949No. 47417Published

1DissentMulroney, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent from Divisions II and III of the majority opinion. The plaintiff in his petition prayed for “such reduction in payment of rents as the' court may determine will compensate the plaintiff for the failure to make such improvement.” The tidal court reduced the rent $20 a month, extending on into the future as long as plaintiff stays on the property under the lease and defendant fails to make the improvement. This provision in the trial court’s decree receives the approval of the majority of this court.

The general rule is that a landlord’s agreement in a lease, to repair…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stone v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Piper v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Mitchell v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  5. Community Theaters, Inc. v. WeilbacherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API