Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Estrada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered May 4, 1989, as, after a hearing, modified a judgment of divorce dated June 5, 1985, between the parties by granting the father sole custody of the parties’ son.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Orange County, for a further hearing and determination in accordance herewith, to be preceded by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Skolnick v. SkolnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Audubon v. AudubonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Conti v. ContiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. KeatsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Clark v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Amato v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Walash v. WalashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Wiener v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API