Maitland v. Graham
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, District Judge.
The facts and argument in this case do not differ materially from those presented in Pelzer v. Newhall (decided by this court on April 13, 1899) 93 Fed. 684. Complainant insists, however, that this court departed from the customary-rule in matters of this kind, in choosing to follow the decision of Ihe court of appeals of the Third circuit upon a preliminary injunction (Manufacturing Co. v. Pelzer, 34 C. C. A. 45, 91 Fed. 665), instead of that of the court of appeals of the Second circuit upon a final hearing on the merits (Maitland v. Manufacturing Co., 29 C. C. A.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maitland v. B. Goetz Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Maitland v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. PelzerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Pelzer v. NewhallU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1899