Legal Opinion
Redd v. Tennessee Department of Safety
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1995PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES H. O’BRIEN, Special Justice.
This is an appeal from a Court of Appeals’ Rule 10 order affirming the trial court and the Tennessee Department of Safety’s dismissal of the petitioner’s claim for the return of forfeited personal property confiscated in connection with a drug arrest. Both lower courts and the Department of Safety found that the petitioner failed to comply with filing deadlines imposed by the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, under T.C.A. § 4-5-322, and, therefore, any claim that the petitioner may have had was time barred. The issue presented on appeal concerns…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doe v. NorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Jerry Lewis TuttleTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Charles D. SprungerTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Games-Neely Ex Rel. West Virginia State Police v. 1175 Sam Mason Road Loacated in Mill Creek DistrictWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ally Financial v. Tennessee Department of Safety & Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
- Waynell C. Burnette v. Teddy SundeenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.