McDonald v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
In this negligence case, the trial court found that plaintiff Clarice McDonald is a “statutory employee” under the Workers’ Compensation Law. As a result, the trial court dismissed her petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She appeals; we affirm.
Plaintiff sets forth four points relied on. In effect, however, only two points are raised. First, the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss, because plaintiff was not a statutory employee of defendant. We disagree, because the record supports the trial court’s determination. Second, the trial court’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zahn v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rutherford v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Viselli v. Missouri Theatre Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- McGuire v. Tenneco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schneider v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Taylor v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- DuBose v. Flightsafety International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mooney v. Missouri Athletic ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dillard v. DickensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.