Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1990No. 56823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

In this negligence case, the trial court found that plaintiff Clarice McDonald is a “statutory employee” under the Workers’ Compensation Law. As a result, the trial court dismissed her petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She appeals; we affirm.

Plaintiff sets forth four points relied on. In effect, however, only two points are raised. First, the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss, because plaintiff was not a statutory employee of defendant. We disagree, because the record supports the trial court’s determination. Second, the trial court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zahn v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Rutherford v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Viselli v. Missouri Theatre Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. McGuire v. Tenneco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Taylor v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. DuBose v. Flightsafety International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Mooney v. Missouri Athletic ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Dillard v. DickensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API