Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Dickens

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1994No. 18496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRISON, Judge.

Elmer Dillard (Appellant) filed a claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits against Respondent (Dickens) which was denied by the administrative law judge (ALJ) and, on appeal, by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). On this appeal, since the Commission affirmed and adopted the award denying compensation, we review the decision and findings of the ALJ as adopted by the Commission. Cole v. Town & Country Exteriors, 837 S.W.2d 580, 583 (Mo.App.1992).

The standard of appellate review in Workers’ Compensation cases is well defined. We view the evidence and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Tenneco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Rector v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Ceradsky v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Montgomery v. Mine La Motte CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Cole v. Town & Country ExteriorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Horner v. HammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Evans v. Groves Iron WorksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Martinez v. Nationwide PaperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Brito-Pacheco v. Tina's Hair SalonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API