Latta v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack-
-Affirming.
This case involves the attractive nuisance doctrine. The appeal challenges the correctness of the action of the trial judge in granting a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellees at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence.
During the early part of 1939 the appellee, W. W. Brooks, employed the Horace McClellan Contracting Builders to build a house for him in Louisville. Horace McClellan, another appellee, and president of the corporation, supervised the construction work. Jimmy Latta, who was then about five and one-half years of age,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gnau v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Beetz v. City of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Rothenberger v. Powers Fuel, Feed, Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Juntti v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chesser Ex Rel. Chesser v. Louisville Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Genovese v. New Orleans Public ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Goben Ex Rel. Goben v. Sidney Winer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Martin v. Sessum Service Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Haar v. Vogelman Bakery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.