In Re the Welfare of D.D.R.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentLansing, Judge
I agree that the district court properly sentenced D.D.R. by imposing a juvenile sentence and not imposing a stayed adult sentence on the third-degree criminal-sexual-conduct offense. But I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that cumulative error requires that we reverse and remand for a new trial.
I
The majority identifies three errors that combined to deny D.D.R. a fair trial: the prosecutor’s statements in closing argument about the presumption of innocence, the district court’s procedure for D.D.R.’s use of J.B.’s videotaped statement, and the court’s instruction to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. AniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.