Fleet v. Dorland
New York Supreme Court
Application for partition, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Roosevelt, Justice.
The plaintiff is the reversionary owner of only one-third, while the defendants represent two-thirds of the premises, said to be held in common. She asks a sale, to divide the proceeds&emdash;they a reference, to divide the land. She insists that a sale is best for the interests of the defendants; the defendants rejoin that they themselves are the best judges of their own interests.
*490Under these circumstances, as there is no serious difficulty, at the proper time, in effecting an actual partition of the premises in question, to make the decree of sale asked for by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hart v. VoseNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Tucker v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reyburn v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Pratt v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1884
- Smith v. BlindburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Gunning v. CarmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1877
- Peirce v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.