Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. County of Box Butte

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1958No. 34353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action to recover the excessive and void portion of a tax paid to the county, it being alleged that the tax assessed and collected is in excess of the amount authorized by section 77-1104, R. S. Supp., 1955. The defendant asserts that the tax levied is not in excess of the amount authorized, and that, in any event, Laws 1953, chapter 290, page 985, codified as sections 77-1104 and 77-1105, R. S. Supp., 1955, is unconstitutional and void in that it violates Article III, section 1, Article II, section 1, Article III, section 14, and Article III, section 18, of the Nebraska…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Laflin v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Beisner v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Jensen v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Winslow v. FleischnerOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GreenburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. County of Otoe v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. County of Otoe v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Opinion No. (1982), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1982
  5. Sidney Education Ass'n v. School District of SidneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API