Sidney Education Ass'n v. School District of Sidney
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentNewton, J.
The opinion submitted by Spencer, J., holds, in substance, that sections 48-810.01 and 79-1290, R. S. Supp., 1969, do not conflict with other provisions of Chapter 48, article 8, R. S. Supp., 1969. It is stated that the Court of Industrial Relations has the power to settle any controversy over wages or working conditions and, in so doing, is not compelling the school district to enter into any contract but is simply settling a dispute. This is an obvious fallacy. Section 48-819, R. R. S. 1943, makes the orders of the court binding upon all parties and failure to comply is punishable by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GreenburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Beal v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Tukey v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. County of Box ButteNebraska Supreme Court · 1958