Legal Opinion

Weideman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 2008No. 87A01-0801-CR-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Chad M. Weide-man (Weideman), appeals his conviction for public nudity, as a Class B misdemean- or, Ind.Code § 35-45-4-1.5(c).

We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

Weideman raises three issues, which we restate as the following two issues:(1) Whether the public nudity statute, I.C. § 35^45-4-1.5, is unconstitutionally vague; and(2) Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction of Weideman beyond a reasonable doubt.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 10, 2006, at approximately 8:45 p.m., Gerald Bowser (Bowser) and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BaysingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Neville v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Stratton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brice Hinton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Rodregus Morgan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Gallagher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API