Weideman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, Chad M. Weide-man (Weideman), appeals his conviction for public nudity, as a Class B misdemean- or, Ind.Code § 35-45-4-1.5(c).
We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
Weideman raises three issues, which we restate as the following two issues:(1) Whether the public nudity statute, I.C. § 35^45-4-1.5, is unconstitutionally vague; and(2) Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction of Weideman beyond a reasonable doubt.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 10, 2006, at approximately 8:45 p.m., Gerald Bowser (Bowser) and his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BaysingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Neville v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stratton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brice Hinton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rodregus Morgan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gallagher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009