Legal Opinion

State v. Fernandez

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2009No. 2007AP1403-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (2005-06).1 The court of appeals asks us whether State v. Loutsch, 2003 WI App *60216, ¶ 25, 259 Wis. 2d 901, 656 N.W.2d 781 (Ct. App. 2002), correctly interprets the criminal restitution statute2 when it states that a court may order only as much restitution as a defendant has the ability to pay within the term of the sentence.3

¶ 2. On the question involving restitution ordered during a sentence or probation term, we hold that the statute, when read as a whole, clearly permits a circuit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Prue v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Andrew J. MatasekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Shawn T. WiskerchenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. State v. Kordell L. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. Ryan M. MuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API