Fandel v. Allen
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Lytton
I dissent. I believe that defendant has the right to raise plaintiffs noncompliance with the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) as an affirmative defense; furthermore, plaintiffs noncompliance with the Act precludes him from foreclosing on his mechanic’s lien.
I
In 2000, the Illinois General Assembly created the Act because “the business of home repair and remodeling is a matter affecting the public interest.” 815 ILCS 513/5 (West 2006). The purpose of the Act is “to safeguard the life, health, property and public welfare of [Illinois’s] citizens” through “improved communications and accurate…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.