ART Research and Technology LLC v. Google, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ART RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY Case No. 24-cv-04898-AMO LLC, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 22 GOOGLE, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 In this patent case about media “clipping” and “stitching” technology, Defendants Google 14 and YouTube move to dismiss Plaintiff ART Research and Technology LLC’s (“ART”) complaint 15 in its entirety for failure to state a claim. Defendants’ motion is fully briefed and because it was 16 suitable for decision without oral argument, the Court vacated…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.