F J Siller & Co. v. City of Hart
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals found a contract provision that arbitration as a "condition precedent” to the filing of a court action does not preclude the commencement of an action inconsistent with the arbitration award. We disagree and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of leave to appeal, reverse the Court of Appeals.
The defendant City of Hart needed sewage treatment facilities. Plaintiff agreed to perform the necessary work. The contract contained this language:
"Both parties to this contract agree that as conditions precedent to the filing of an action in any court involving the amount or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- E. E. Tripp Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Jackson CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Acme Cut Stone Co. v. New Center Development Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Stadel v. Granger Brothers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Frolich v. Walbridge-Aldinger Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- F. J. Siller & Co. v. City of HartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wold Architects and Engineers v. StratMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- BRUCKER v. McKINLAY TRANSPORT, INCMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- F J Siller & Co. v. City of HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Simmons v. Golf Course Specialists, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.