Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Morse

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 6, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On report. Real action to recover the possession of certain premises in Chesterville. The opinion states the material facts. The word " remainder,” as used in the will, has a well settled legal signification, viz : " A remnant of an estate in land, depending upon a particular prior estate, created at the same time, and by the same instrument, and limited to arise immediately on the termination of that estate, and not in abridgement of it.” 4 Kent.

Read the full summary

On report. Real action to recover the possession of certain premises in Chesterville. The opinion states the material facts. The word " remainder,” as used in the will, has a well settled legal signification, viz : " A remnant of an estate in land, depending upon a particular prior estate, created at the same time, and by the same instrument, and limited to arise immediately on the termination of that estate, and not in abridgement of it.” 4 Kent. Com. 197. "An estate limited to take effect and be enjoyed after another estate is. ended.” 2 Black. Com. 163, 164. But if the testator meant by…

1Opinion of the CourtWalton, J.

This is a real action, and the only question is whether John Mitchell, by his last will and testament, gave his wife a fee simple estate in the demanded premises, or only an estate for life.

It is the opinion of the court that he gave her a fee simple estate. A devise of real estate without words of limitation vests in the devisee an estate in fee simple; and this result is not defeated by a devise over of the remainder. If a life estate only is given, a devise over of the remainder is good. But when by the terms of the devise an estate in fee simple is given, the addition ‘ of a devise over…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bills v. BillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Rogers v. WinklespleckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Heath v. BorstOhio Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API