Legal Opinion

United States v. Witherspoon

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 13, 1981No. CM 439581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*589OPINION OF THE COURT

O’DONNELL, Judge:

At his trial by general court-martial at Fort Ord, California, the appellant was convicted of rape in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. His approved sentence includes a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, partial forfeitures for two years, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.

During the voir dire portion of the trial, the defense counsel asked the court-members if they felt they were “in any way racially prejudiced.” The military judge stated that he did not see how the members…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WitherspoonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. AccordinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. McNuttArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. BouldenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API