Legal Opinion
Hillsdale PBA Local 207 v. Borough of Hillsdale
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 17, 1994PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
This case, like its companion case, Township of Washington v. New Jersey State Policemen’s Benevolent Ass’n, Local 206, 137 N.J. 88, 644 A.2d 573 (1994), involves the sufficiency of a compulsory-interest-arbitration award. Petitioner, Hillsdale PBA Local 207 (Local 207 or the PBA), and respondent, Borough of Hillsdale (the Borough or Hillsdale), could not agree on the terms of a collective-negotiation agreement for the Borough police force for the years 1991, 1992, and 1993. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:13A-14 to -21, an amendment to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n, Local 29 v. Town of IrvingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Division 540, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Mercer County Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Newark Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Harper-Lawrence v. United Merchants and ManufacturersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Loigman v. Township CommitteeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Habick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Teamsters Local 97 v. State of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- In re the City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- In Re Camden County ProsecutorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.