Legal Opinion

In Re Camden County Prosecutor

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 18, 2007PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

925 A.2d 63 (2007)

394 N.J. Super. 15

In the Matter of CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Respondent-Respondent, and

Camden County Assistant Prosecutors' Association, Petitioner-Appellant.

In the Matter of Union County Prosecutor, Respondent-Respondent, and

Union County Assistant Prosecutors' Association, Petitioner-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued/Submitted May 21, 2007.

Decided June 18, 2007.

Michael A. Bukosky argued the cause for appellant in A-6631-05T1 (Loccke, Correia, Schlager, Limsky & Bukosky, Hackensack, attorneys; Mr. Bukosky, of counsel and on the brief; Marcia…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n, Local 29 v. Town of IrvingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Bent v. Township of StaffordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Tlumac v. High Bridge StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Hillsdale PBA Local 207 v. Borough of HillsdaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Cwa. v. Pba. Local 203New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  3. Township of Franklin v. Franklin Township PBA Local 154New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  4. In Re CasaleggioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. New Brunswick Mun. Emps. Ass'n v.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API