Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Mills

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1951No. 17513PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While the fact that the defendant and his wife were subpoenaed before the grand jury and required to give testimony against the defendant in the investigation of a robbery charge, and this testimony was taken into consideration by the grand jury in the return of the indictment against the defendant and several others for the offense of robbery, would have furnished good ground for plea in abatement to the indictment, for the reason that the testimony of the defendant against himself was in violation of the provisions of paragraph 6, article 1, section 1 of the Constitution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sarah v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  3. Wells v. PridgenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Gatlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Elam v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Multi-Line Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Johnson v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Peppers v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API