Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Parks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1915No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by Eugene Brooks against Austin R. Parks and others for the construction of the will of Polly Robinson, deceased. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, C. J.

Complainant files his bill of complaint in this cause for the purpose of securing a construction of the will of Polly Robinson, deceased. The will was made October 5, 1881, and admitted to probate March 4, 1889. At the time the will was made, 'and at the time of her death, the testatrix had two daughters, Anna E. Parks and Martha J. Brooks, and no other children. She had four grandchildren, all of whom survived — Austin R. Parks, Edgar A. Parks, and Polly E. Bray, children of Anna E. Parks, and Francis E. Brooks, the only child of Martha J. Brooks, and this complainant, her husband. Her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leake v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  2. Gold v. JudsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. Rand v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  4. Ruggles v. RandallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  5. Smith v. WinsorIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Dodge TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In Re Wagar's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API