Legal Opinion

Leake v. Watson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1891PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Action by a trustee to recover the value of certain stocks and bonds claimed to belong to the trust estate ; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County. Facts found and the case reserved for advice. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTobkance, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff as trustee of certain estate for Georgianna Nichols, under the will of her father, Charles Bulkley, against the defendant, to recover the value of sundry stocks and bonds, alleged to belong to the trust estate, and to have been received and sold by the defendant as a broker, with knowledge that the same were being sold and disposed of in violation of the trust.

Upon a former hearing before this court, on a reservation made by the Superior Court, it was found that the claims of the parties virtually called for the judicial construction of the will of Charles…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gold v. JudsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  2. Rand v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  3. Jocelyn v. NottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  4. Tappan's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  5. Leake v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. Russell v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. St. John v. DannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  4. Beers v. NarramoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API