Legal Opinion

United States v. Herman Prichett

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 12, 1990No. 89-3579PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Our review of the sentencing hearing transcript satisfies us that the government failed to raise any objection to the district court’s decision to depart from the career offender guideline applicable in this case. Normally, we will not consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal. United States v. Belsky, 799 F.2d 1485, 1488 n. 4 (11th Cir.1986). This rule is also applicable to sentencing proceedings. See, e.g., United States v. Houston, et al., 892 F.2d 696, 706-07 (8th Cir.1989) (government’s failure to object to defendants’ motion that sentencing guidelines were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Gerald Henry Belsky, Marsha Brawner, Susan Klebe, James Carr and Connie CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Brian Bafia, Michael Kerridan, John Cappas and Philip LaportaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Jimmy Lee Jefferies, Betty J. JefferiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Daniel Perkins, United States of America v. Daniel PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Brian Thomas, Floyd JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API