Legal Opinion

United States v. Houston

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1989No. Nos. 89-5039 to 89-5044 and 89-5072 to 89-5077PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Six defendants appeal from verdicts and sentences resulting from their joint trial. The defendants were found guilty on various counts of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute “crack” cocaine, of possession with intent to distribute and manufacture cocaine, and of aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute cocaine.1 The government cross-appeals, *699claiming that the appellants should have been sentenced under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm both the convictions and the sentences.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 18, 1988, Roland Adkins telephoned the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Javier Barajas-NunezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Cedric L. RouletteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Keith WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Shahid R. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Steven A. FilkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API