Avocent Redmond Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Avocent Redmond Corp.’s Motion for Entiy of a Protective Order, filed on June 5, 2008, and Rose Electronics’ Cross-Motion for Entry of a Protective Order, filed on June 23, 2008. Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs on this matter and oral argument held on November 25, 2008, Avocent Redmond Corp.’s Motion for Entry of a Protective Order is GRANTED. Rose Electronics’ Cross-Motion for Entiy of a Protective Order is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement ease brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 regarding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christo v. PadgettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Rf Delaware, Inc. v. Pacific Keystone Technologies, Inc., Bca Industrial Controls (1995) Limited, Clearwater Technologies, Inc., and Michael MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Dana v. E.S. Originals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Methode Electronics, Inc. v. DPH-DAS LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010